The customer data platform built exclusively for multi-unit restaurants.
.png)
Restaurants have spent the last two years raising prices aggressively in response to inflation. The cumulative effect has crossed a threshold: fast food no longer feels like the affordable option to most consumers. A more promotional environment followed — greater competition over fewer dining dollars, with brands across every segment fighting to hold frequency. As McDonald's CFO Ian Borden told analysts after Q1 earnings: "Everybody is fighting for fewer consumers. We have to make sure we have that street fighting capability."
Q1 2026 made that dynamic impossible to ignore. Macro headwinds were broad and consistent across the category — severe weather early in the quarter, gas prices pressuring lower-income consumers, consumer confidence near multi-year lows. Most brands cited at least one of those factors on their earnings calls. The near-universal response was the same: launch a value platform, push a meal deal, get loud about price.
But the brands running the loudest value campaigns didn't necessarily win. Nowhere is that more visible than with burger brands — the vertical with the widest spread of outcomes in Q1 and the clearest read on what actually drives traffic in this environment. McDonald's posted +3.9% U.S. comps, Burger King +5.8% — both primarily check-driven. Shake Shack's 4.6% comp growth was primarily traffic-driven. Wendy's fell 7.8%. Jack in the Box fell 6.7%.
Despite facing the same macro environment, results varied widely. The brands that held up won on better product, stronger digital infrastructure, and operations consistent enough that guests didn't need a coupon to come back. Here's how it played out across the category.
McDonald's and Burger King both posted positive comps in Q1 — but neither got there by discounting alone.
McDonald's relaunched its McValue menu in April with 10 items under $3, a $4 breakfast meal deal, and $5 and $6 lunch and dinner meal deals. McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski was direct about this intent: "We're not going to get beat on value." But the menu wasn't just about price. McDonald's simultaneously launched the Big Arch, a premium burger aimed at the higher end of the menu, and expanded McCafé with six new specialty drinks including dirty sodas. The strategy, which Kempczinski called "3 for 3" — value leadership, breakthrough marketing, and menu innovation — is designed so neither move exists in isolation.
On the digital side, MyMcDonald's Rewards now has 210 million 90-day active members and over $40 billion in systemwide loyalty sales in 2025, giving McDonald's the ability to personalize its value offers at scale. McDonald's has also said that U.S. customers who join the program more than double their visits in the first year.
Burger King's results were arguably more surprising. U.S. comps came in at +5.8% — nearly double analyst expectations — and CEO Josh Kobza was clear that it wasn't a single promotion that drove it: "It wasn't driven by one collaboration or campaign." The most interesting part of the story is the Whopper. BK U.S. president Tom Curtis cited 70,000 customer calls as the catalyst behind fixing the product — a glazed bun, creamier mayo, a meaningfully better sandwich. The result was the highest Whopper average unit volumes in over three years. Value offers like Whopper Wednesday, $5 Duos, and $3.99 King Jr. Meals gave guests a reason to come in. The improved product gave them a reason to come back. As Kobza put it: "When we invite guests back to experience a better Burger King, they come and they stay."
Operationally, both brands are investing at the system level. McDonald's is mid-rollout on its Best Burger remodel program and has set a target of routing 30% of delivery orders through its own app by 2027, by using loyalty adoption to pull customers into owned channels, while partners like DoorDash Drive and Uber Direct handle the actual fulfillment. Burger King has now deployed $189 million of a planned $550 million Royal Reset investment in remodels and kitchen upgrades. The bet, for both, is that sustained investment in product, operations, and technology compounds in ways that a promotional cycle cannot.
Wendy's and Jack in the Box both ran value programs in Q1. Both lost traffic anyway.
Wendy's launched Biggie Deals in January, featuring $4 Biggie Bites, a $6 Biggie Bag, and an $8 Biggie Bundle, replacing the long-running 4-for-$4. Interim CEO Ken Cook described the $6 tier as the "full meal price point" and the heaviest traffic driver of the three. The intent was clear: "an everyday value platform that customers can count on, as opposed to jumping from one price-promoted offer to another." U.S. same-restaurant sales still fell 7.8% — the fifth consecutive negative quarter and the worst result in over a decade — and was driven by fewer guests, not lower checks.
Jack in the Box leaned on its 75th anniversary for their value play — $0.75 tacos, a $0.75 Jumbo Jack — and described a "barbell" strategy balancing price-point promos with higher-margin innovation. CEO Lance Tucker acknowledged the underlying problem on the call: "Our value equation was not resonating and lacked enough price-point value." System same-store sales fell 6.7%, the third consecutive steep decline.
The daypart picture tells its own story. Wendy's breakfast was the worst-performing daypart, dragging U.S. comps by more than 100 basis points. Late night was the only bright spot. Jack in the Box reported the same pattern — late night the only daypart with gains, breakfast daypart traffic struggled, though breakfast menu performance held up given its all-day positioning.
On digital, the gap is meaningful. Wendy's digital mix reached 23.6% — growing, but not converting to traffic recovery. Wendy's integrated an AI recommendation engine into its mobile app and is investing in checkout flow improvements, but Cook acknowledged the results "are still not where we need to be." Jack in the Box's digital story makes the point differently: digital offers are available system-wide, but company-operated restaurants consistently activate them while franchisees are more selective about opting in. That inconsistency is showing up directly in the comp gap between the two groups.
Both brands are mid-turnaround. Wendy's Project Fresh is closing underperforming units — more than half of planned footprint optimization completed in Q1. Jack in the Box's Jack on Track plan closed 14 locations against just 6 openings in the quarter and divested Del Taco in December 2025. The operational work is real. The traffic hasn't followed yet.
Shake Shack grew traffic in Q1 when almost no one else did. Same-Shack sales rose 4.6%, traffic was up 1.4% — the third consecutive quarter of positive traffic growth — and digital mix reached 39.9% with app downloads and guest count up more than 35% year over year. CEO Rob Lynch has been consistent about what the brand is doing: "Shake Shack is bringing the experience of a $25 burger to a lot of people who don't typically get to eat $25 burgers."
Shake Shack’s value strategy looks nothing like McDonald's or Wendy's, partly by design and partly by necessity. With ~685 locations, Shake Shack doesn't have the national footprint to run a mass-market meal deal. Instead, the brand relies on app-exclusive offers — $1 drinks, $3 fries, $5 shakes — paired with premium LTOs like the BBQ Baby Back Rib Sandwich and Korean-inspired menu items to drive engagement through its digital channels. Management said the app is already "driving a lot of our traffic growth," and the numbers support it: digital guest count grew 35%+ YoY and digital guest lifetime value rose roughly 20% from higher visit frequency.
The next phase is Project Catalyst, announced in April 2026. Despite a 39.9% digital mix, Shake Shack has historically had no formal loyalty program and no way to engage guests beyond the transaction. Project Catalyst is designed to close that gap by connecting POS, kitchen systems, loyalty, AI, and guest behavior data into a single platform, partnering with Qu on POS and kitchen display systems and building the brand's first-ever loyalty program. For a brand scaling toward 1,500 company-operated locations, Lynch has framed this inititive as a shift from building more locations to building the systems that can sustain Shake Shack’s scale.
But the P&L is messier than the traffic metrics suggest. Shake Shack swung to a small net loss in Q1, its stock fell roughly 20% post-earnings, and adjusted EBITDA missed consensus by 19%. The culprits: a 240-basis-point weather comp headwind, beef inflation, third-party and pre-opening costs that surged as the company opened 17 new units in Q1 versus just 4 in the prior year. Delivery economics also added a quieter drag: third-party delivery volume grew while Shake Shack rolled off the higher delivery prices it had previously charged to offset platform commissions.
Premium burger demand is real. The model just absorbs macro headwinds less forgivingly than a chain with McDonald's scale.
Not every burger brand reports quarterly earnings — but the Technomic Top 500 data tells a consistent story. Culver's grew systemwide sales 14% in 2025. In-N-Out grew 9.6%. Whataburger grew roughly 9.4%. None of them ran a national value campaign to get there.
Culver's CEO Julie Fussner has been direct about the positioning: "For us, value is quality plus service over price. We're focused on upping the numerator of that equation through better food, better service, and a better overall experience." That equation depends on franchisee quality. As Fussner put it: "The only way to do that is if we never lose present, engaged, owner-operators. So that is a non-negotiable for us." Operators come up through the system and are expected to be hands-on in their restaurants, which is how the experience stays consistent enough to justify the check.
In-N-Out takes a similar approach with even less infrastructure — no app, no discounting, no value menu — and commands some of the highest estimated AUVs in the industry at over $5 million. Whataburger is proving the model can travel, expanding rapidly east of its Texas base and surpassing $4 billion in revenue for the first time in 2024.
This quarter, Culver's, In-N-Out, and Whataburger showed that product and experience when executed consistently can become an effective retention strategy. Guests leave feeling like they got more than they paid for, and that perception, built over years of operational consistency, is what brings them back without a promotional trigger. Many brands in the burger category are spending significant margin to engineer the right offer at the right moment to drive the next visit. For these three, the product and experience largely do that work instead. It's not a scalable playbook for every brand, but it does reframe what investing in retention actually means.
The burger brands that grew in Q1 — McDonald's, Burger King, Shake Shack, Culver's, In-N-Out — were building the kind of guest experience that earns repeat visits without a coupon attached.
Discounts can drive a transaction. They can't fix a product problem, an operations problem, or a digital experience gap. The brands that struggled in Q1 — Wendy's, Jack in the Box — are mid-turnaround with real operational work underway. The challenge is that value is a harder lever to pull when the foundation underneath it is still being rebuilt.
The broader takeaway from Q1 is that the category has hit a ceiling on standardized national discounting as a traffic unlock. Even McDonald's comp was check-led, not traffic-led. While it used to be enough to have a loyalty program, now the question is whether the program is mature enough to actually change guest behavior. For the brands that are struggling, that gap is getting harder to close. Shake Shack's traffic growth in one of the hardest quarters in recent memory is worth sitting with: premium demand is real, and consumers haven't abandoned quality even in this macro-environment.
Q1 showed that consumers under pressure don't simply default to whoever offers the lowest price — they get more deliberate about where they spend. The brands that held or grew traffic gave guests a compelling reason to show up: better product, a more consistent experience, a digital relationship sophisticated enough to feel personal. Promotional spend alone couldn't manufacture that. If anything, a difficult quarter made the distinction between brands that have built something durable and those still working toward it that much clearer.
The customer data platform built exclusively for multi-unit restaurants.